When Stew was suffering with
massive anxiety issues and the thought of going anywhere, or doing anything,
was so overwhelming he would shake at the thought of it (and not a good sort of
shake), I would ask him to make an effort.
That doesn’t sound particularly
helpful, does it?
I would also tell him that it was
his choice, and that if he didn't attend (fill in the blank), the world would
not come to an end. "But I do want you to make an effort," I'd say,
"Even if it's only to get dressed and get in the car. Then, if you still
don't feel up to it, you can stop and come back in."
I'd break it into tasks for him.
Shower. Check. Get dressed. Check. Go out to car. Check. Get in car. If the
world hadn't fallen to pieces around him by then, there was a better than even
chance that he would make it at least partway to his destination, if not all
the way.
A better than even chance may not
sound like much, but it's certainly better than making no effort at all.
This doesn't work for everyone,
of course -- everyone operates differently. All I can tell you is what worked
for us. And your partner has to be willing to make the painful effort of
trying.
Make no mistake -- it is very
painful. If the thought of leaving the house can cause one to break out in
hives, make their heart race and breathing become difficult, the act of leaving
the house can make all that even worse.
I find anti-anxiety meds help
with that. But as much as they help, they don't relieve the problem. They don't
make it go away and they don't make life suddenly easy. But they can calm the
physical symptoms enough so we can consider the possibility of taking that next
step.
Some of our loved ones don't have
the motivation to take that next step, they're comfortable being who they are,
and aren't interested in making that extra effort to get past it. "You
just don't understand," they might say, as if your understanding would
make all the difference.
"If only you would
understand."
And so we try. We reassure them,
we tell them we understand, we make allowances because they're ill, and we keep
trying to understand.
But they still refuse to leave
the house, because all of our understanding isn't what they need. All of our
attention, our time, and our devotion to their illness aren't what they need.
I don't know what they do need.
I'm not an expert. I'm just experienced with a few individual situations. But I
do know that external measures aren't going to be enough. They need to want to
do better for themselves, not just because you say they need to.
With Stew it was easy. He wasn't
likely to use the "You just don't understand" line with me because he
knew that it didn't matter if I understood or not. I was there to help him
through it, and relating to it wasn't as necessary as listening to what he
needed. He had the internal motivation to get better -- he was driven by his
own vision of what he wanted his future to look like, and it did not include
being a shut-in.
Even when it seemed as if being a
recluse was the most attractive option.
I don't believe in the coddle
theory of helping, which is when we say, "It's okay, you don't have to do
anything you don't want to do," as if a little more time and rest will
solve the issue, as if by magic. I believe in the sort of pushy theory of
helping, which goes more like this: "Try it, make an effort, because if
you at least make an effort, you'll feel better about it, even if you don't
make it all the way. Trying is an accomplishment."
And that's the point to
emphasize. Trying is an accomplishment. Not trying at all is giving up before
we even try. Sometimes that's appropriate, but mostly it's not, not if we want
to make progress.
Some days, the best we can hope
for is just a bit of effort. It can make the world look just a little bit more
attainable, and it can make the next effort just a little bit easier. But
without that first step, well, the first step is the hardest, isn't it? And if
we never take it, how can we get to the next one?
No comments:
Post a Comment